Title: Training beginning therapists to respond to basic ethical situations in therapy: deliberate practice vs case discussion
Authors: Benjamin M. Ogles, Annie Schramel, Colby Schramel, Colby Monson, Carter Chugg and Kristin Lang Hansen
Published in: Taylor & Francis
Abstract:
In this small, randomly controlled pilot study, we compared deliberate practice (DP) with case discussion (CD) for training beginning therapists to manage basic ethical situations. First-year graduate students were randomly assigned to a DP (n = 7) or CD (n = 8) workshop about ethics in therapy. After receiving didactic instructions, the DP group practiced responding to ethical scenarios with feedback and repetition while the CD group engaged in group discussions of illustrative cases. Outcomes included self-report skills, knowledge, and confidence and blind ethical performance ratings (EPRS) of pre- and post-video recorded performance on eight therapy simulations portraying basic yet challenging ethical situations. Both DP and CD improved self-report and performance-based outcomes for beginning trainees learning to handle ethical situations in therapy. However, the DP group performed better than the CD group in the multiple relationship scenarios. This small, pilot study provides initial evidence that DP may provide added benefits to traditional methods of ethical training with beginning therapists.
We invite you to read the full publication here: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2024.2407871
and engage in the conversation. Share your thoughts on social media, tag @BYUsorensencenter, and let us know how this research resonates with you.